Great article, showing the current (very interesting) attitude of clinicians to AI and its implementation in medicine.
“Only 40 (5.9%) answered that they had good familiarity with AI” - however most of the clinicians were happy to give opinions about how good it was, where it would work best and that it couldn’t replace them - I think some education would help us here. Awesome that it was a mobile survey (obviously have digital clinician identity sorted in South Korea).
opengraphobject:[351561256590523 : https://www.jmir.org/2019/3/e12422/ : title=“JMIR - Physician Confidence in Artificial Intelligence: An Online Mobile Survey | Oh | Journal of Medical Internet Research” : description=“Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet”]
I totally agree. The fact that most clinicians (including New Zealand) do not exactly know what the Al is capable of, how it works, what are the limitations and pitfalls, what are the hypes (as @Diana_Siew ) referred to, necessitates a comprehensive education program
opengraphobject:[351561256590523 : https://www.jmir.org/2019/3/e12422/ : title=“JMIR - Physician Confidence in Artificial Intelligence: An Online Mobile Survey | Oh | Journal of Medical Internet Research” : description=“Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet”]